About your Search

20130117
20130125
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)
failed. >> eric: we did. >> dana: collectively. >> eric: you experienced two of them, right? >> dana: only one. 2004. >> eric: tell us what goes through in president's mind for speech writing. >> dana:be in some ways they say wow it's so liberal. it was different from other inaugurals, from the liberal or the democrats. they tend to be lofty in rhetoric. then the "state of the union" address coming february 12. three weeks. we get to have another big speech. this speech was lot like hist t. there are things he's not planning to do anything about. one is gay marriage. he talked about the position last june when he announced that, he said in the interview he did not plan to push for constitutional amendment. especially no legislation i'm aware of that he is planning to push. then on climate change. he didn't do anything for the last four years except for some things to make it difficult for coal fired power plants to operate. but he is actually not going to be able to do anything to stop it. you don't read between the lines and say we like it. it was really good! >> greg: i have a prob
of public opinion which is very relevant here. dana jacobson has interviewed lance armstrong, good to see body of you. let me start by asking each of you, anyone who wasn't watching you last night, you watched the first part of the interview. you were both -- you were not satisfied. i'm putting it nicely. you didn't think he did a good job. >> he wasn't contrite at all. he didn't -- he may have been trying to say i'm sorry. he didn't even come close to it in the way he acted and the way he acted toward people that he hurt. i don't know how he makes up for it tonight. i don't know how that's possible -- >> you don't think he could say something -- he's talking about his wife, his children -- >> i think he could have cried and nobody would have -- i shouldn't say nobody. most people would not have believed him. i think i said at the end of last night, what's so difficult, it was probably too soon. i don't know if he could say anything where he could get the majority of people on his side at this point because he lied for so long about this and he went after people. he didn't just lie, he we
in our penl. david epstein is a senior writer for "sports illustrated." dana jacobson is with cbs sports and paul callan is our legal contributor. you were all critical last night. you didn't feel satisfied. let me ask you, did you feel that -- did he win you another tonight? >> no. and i said earlier there's probably no way he could have won me over. maybe i saw a little more human side when his kids were mentioned. he was -- oprah said do you owe people an apology and he listed the people he owes an apology to, and he didn't do it last night when he had a chance. he didn't do it tonight when he had a chance. he could have done that publicly the way he humiliated them publicly. he didn't win me over. >> he did have a moment where he cried talking about his kids tonight, that there was emotion. but when he answered all of the other questions, david, did you feel better? >> well, i think people would have wanted to see the crying when he was talking about somebody else who he damaged. i don't think it's a surprise that he would be sad about his own loss or the harm in his own life, but he
together, steven chew, on your right, congressman dana rohrbacher, not much in common, except the rob the liquor store stocking caps for these two. both saved up for the day. justice scalia wore a more floppy hat, but he wants you to know his is supposed to look like this one, modelled after thomas moore, who had his head cut off. after the weird hat was the most remarked piece of head gear, since aretha franklin's hat in 2009. and i admit, mr. scalia's hat is notable, as congressman? what are you doing? for the record to be clear, the first lady on monday wore tom
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)